God in the Courtroom

1 (p1): Introduction
1 (p1-1): 1. Mutual Functionality between Legal History and Comparative Law
4 (p1-2): 2. Egyptian Law and Its Arab Weight
9 (p1-3): 3. Methodology and the Art of Borrowing
14 (p1-4): 4. Types of Courtroom Oaths
16 (p2): Ⅰ The Courtroom Oath in Islamic Law, Theory and Practice
16 (p2-1): 1. Islamic Law and Methodology: Legal History and Historical Law
27 (p2-2): 2. Intimate Involvement of God
27 (p2-2-1): 2.1 The meaning of power
28 (p2-2-2): 2.2 Triple impact of anxiety
30 (p2-3): 3. The Islamic Courtroom Oath as a Source of Legal Determination
30 (p2-3-1): 3.1 The courtroom oath and the legal right
34 (p2-3-2): 3.2 The binary approach: between the bayyina and the oath
38 (p2-3-3): 3.3 Criticism of the binary approach
40 (p2-3-4): 3.4 The paradox of the badhl and the restriction of the oath
43 (p2-4): 4. The Types and Modalities of Islamic Oath
43 (p2-4-1): 4.1 The manifestation of the oath
48 (p2-4-2): 4.2 The interpretation of the future oath-objective or subjective
51 (p2-4-3): 4.3 Extra-legal considerations
52 (p2-5): 5. The Technique of the Courtroom Oath
54 (p2-6): 6. The Positions of the Schools on the Subject of the Courtroom Oath: Malikites versus Hanafites
60 (p2-7): 7. The Illusive Mental Dimension of the Islamic Courtroom Oath
64 (p2-8): 8. The Scope of the Courtroom Oath: Issues That May Form the Subject of an Oath
69 (p2-9): 9. A Confrontation between Forms of Proof and Legal Determination: The Oath versus the Bayyina
75 (p2-10): 10. The Defendant and the Courtroom Oath
77 (p2-10-1): 10.1 Affinity (khulta)
79 (p2-11): 11. The Rerendering of the Oath and the Burden of Proof
82 (p2-11-1): 11.1 The development of dynamic revision
86 (p2-12): 12. The Paradox of Mutual Plaintiffs and Defendants (tahaluf)
88 (p2-12-1): 12.1 The lot (qur'a) as a tool for courtroom determination
89 (p2-13): 13. Cases in which the Plaintiff Takes the Oath: A Conceptual Challenge for the Hanafites
90 (p2-13-1): 13.1 Rendering the oath to the plaintiff when…